The Universe and the Time Travellers By Joan Hope
In Loving Memory of Joan Hope
October 4, 1916 - July 9, 2007
Joan Hope's IQ
was 152 graded by Mensa in 1949.
This is a work of genius. Please pay attention.
It is important to note that this book was in manuscript
form in the 1970's and self-published in 1994.
You will see that what Joan knew and wrote about then, is what is being
written about now by Stephen Hawking.
The Contents have all been linked, so you can jump
down to the chapter. Use your BACK button to return here. Everything in the book is not linked here, so be sure to scroll
through the book and use these links as bookmarks or for quick reference.
I wish to thank all who have
helped me in the preparation of this book, particularly Michael
Howard, who was responsible among other things for the diagrams;
and John Nauss, who helped in many ways and checked my manuscript in
both its earlier and its later stages.
UFOs, The Universe and the Time
Copyrightę2013TheLibraryofHope. All Rights Reserved.
No part of this
website book text, sketches or pictures many be published on the internet, copied,
printed or distributed without permission of the publishers. The book
may be quoted in articles and other writings of academic importance, no more
than 30 words at a time without permission. We ask that you pass on the website
address to everyone so they can read it all, and then they may weigh and measure
all of this evidence
to Legitimate Questions and Comments about this book, click below.
Time is created in the
form of a time-slot by lack of relative motion between two
bodies of energy involving a slowing-down of vibrations and is
seen as having infinite length.
Space is created within
the time-slot as a by-product of time and has length, breadth,
Wild time is created as a
by-product of space and exists at the outer limits.
Within space-time speeds
may be either vibratory or linear (velocity).
Seen from within
space-time differences in vibratory speeds appear to be linear.
A time capsule may be
created by increasing the energy vibrations of two or more
bodies to exceed the speed of light and then creating a
time-slot by maintaining lack of relative motion and slowing
down the vibrations within.
Viewed from within a
time-slot all variations in speed outside it appear to be
To travel or create
distance, a time capsule increases its vibrations while
maintaining lack of relative motion within.
A scientist who in the
early 1960s was awarded a Nobel Prize for his discovery of
"plasma" in space and that its particles travel in spirals, has
made the statement that the most difficult aspect of his work
was that of proving his theory by laboratory experiment. One
cannot help wondering how many others before him failed to
launch a new concept such as this simply because he or she could
not devise a means of proving it in the laboratory. By how many
years has our knowledge of the Universe been held up by lack of
As long ago as 1934 it was
discovered that electrons had a "spin" - that is, they travel in
spirals. These spirals give the quantum effect, often described
as "waves" Looking with the aid of a telescope into space, we see
that the galaxies also move in spirals. These are very vast, but
it is surely logical to suggest that the spiral is a basic
feature of the Universe. Long before the theory was accepted in
the 1960s, I had come to accept that this was so. I had no
laboratory at my disposal, but the scientists eventually
provided me with the required laboratory evidence.
The spiral is not the only
thing common to both the tiny atom and the vastness of outer
space. The atom, with its electrons moving around a nucleus,
seems to be remarkably like the Earth with its moon and the Sun
with its planets. Furthermore, the force which binds the atom
has been found to be mathematically equivalent to the binding
force which is known as gravity and is found in all planets and
in the solar system, and in fact in the galaxy as well, though
here it is said to be negative, i.e. expansive.
It is my conviction that
this is a misconception and that the binding force is another of
those basics - like the spiral motion - which are to be found
throughout the Universe. I await laboratory evidence.
I would like to point out,
however, that in some fields it seems to be a mistake to demand
work in a laboratory as confirmation. Its limitations are
obvious, especially where space study and astronomy are
concerned, and I fear that if these demands prevail, they must
come to the point of preventing much of the needed work on the
origin of the Universe. It is quite impossible, as far as I
know, to study conditions in Eternity within a laboratory
situated on Earth or even in a spacecraft in orbit.
It is greatly to the
credit of the discoverer of "plasma" that he actually succeeded
in devising the machines he needed in order to prove his point
and explain it to his fellow scientists in their own terms. The
diagrams which he produced to show the spiral motion of his
plasma particles were amazingly like my own diagrams
illustrating vibrations or movement in space or in Eternity,
including time travel. The plasma which he had discovered was
identical with my "creative thought" or primeval energy. This I
see as the matrix of Eternity, which, when its vibrations slow
down, may form within itself time-slots. The space in such a
time-slot must also contain a certain amount of this energy, and
its presence in stars and planets is known to all; but that it
is also scattered throughout space is entirely new to us when we
remember that space was once thought to be empty, or to contain
only interstellar dust and gases.
As far as I know, no
scientist has yet come forward with proof satisfactory to the
demands of science that the spiralling particles in space are
identical with creative thought as we know it. Still less likely
is the existence, either now or in the future, of laboratory
proof that this primeval energy which has come into our
time-slot from Eternity constitutes a fifth dimension in which
everything exists. The four dimensions so far known are length,
breadth and height (all concerned with space) and time. The
fifth dimension, which is concerned with the primeval energy of
Eternity, I call radiation.
Apart from the facts I
have already mentioned, there are a number of others which may
help us to understand more intimately the Universe in which we
live. These I give below.
Powerful sources of
radiation have been found to exist far out in the Universe. Also
very far out, as far as any telescope can penetrate, has been
found a so-called impenetrable "wall", the nature of which is
still not known.
The more distant galaxies
are more primitive in form than those which appear to be nearer
to us in space, and some of them are "double" or "twin"
galaxies. The more distant galaxies also show the "red shift" -
the farther out they are, the greater the shift towards the red
end of the spectrum.
The existence of "cosmic
rays" has been noticed by astronauts and others.
In the Universe, as in
nature, nothing is wasted and everything which exists has its
opposite or negative equivalent. Here is an interesting link
between fact and thought: it is impossible to form a concept
without at the same time forming a concept of its opposite. Once
again, what is basic to thought seems also to be basic to the
Recurrence is a feature of
infinity. In mathematics we have the recurring number; in space
around us we appear to have recurring galaxies - another
connection between thought and the Universe.
There are many unexplained
phenomena such as dreams, ghosts, clairvoyance, faith healing; and the fact that in certain parts of the world people live to a
The power of thought is
known to exist and is used in various acceptable and less
acceptable ways all over the world; thought control is
practised, whether on oneself or on others. Electrical activity
is known to be present in the brain and nervous system.
Much, then, has been
discovered about the Universe and much has been explained. In
order to understand what is still unexplained, it might be
easier if we try to examine it and all that is in it from the
viewpoint of Eternity. Peering into our time-slot, we may then
see that the Universe is, in relation to Eternity, not expanding
but slowing down - or, in relation to ourselves, has already
slowed down; that our galaxy has divided into two new galaxies,
one containing matter and the other, antimatter, and that they
are held apart by a force exceeding that of their attraction for
each other; and that this force is to be found in the matrix of
Eternity which surrounds us and gives us our fifth dimension -
One of the first galaxies
to be identified as such was the nebulous patch in the
constellation of Andromeda, at first known as the Andromeda
Nebula. The further men peered into space through their
telescopes, the more nebulae they discovered. Only later were
they identified as galaxies like our own Milky Way.
The two apparent patches
of "mist" in Orion, known as the Magellanic Clouds because of
their discovery by the circumnavigator Ferdinand Magellan
(1480?-1521), were found to be attached to the Milky Way.
It was some time before
astronomers realized that the Milky Way was actually, like its
nearest neighbour and like the other nearer galaxies astronomers
could see, lens-shaped and rotating around a bright centre.
A new telescope was
installed at Mount Wilson, U.S.A., in 1917, and it was this
which led to the discovery of apparently millions of nebulae or
galaxies as they were found to be. Only the nearest were seen to
be similar to the Andromeda galaxy -namely thicker in the middle
like a double convex lens and spiral in formation, turning (in
relation to the Earth) from west to east and having the
characteristic trailing spiral arms. The position of the Sun on
one of the arms near the centre and the fact that clouds of
so-called interstellar dust obscure the centre made it difficult
to determine the actual shape of the Milky Way. It was the fact
that the brightest stars were found to lie in distinct lanes
which clinched the matter: the lanes were the arms of the
The galaxies appeared to
astronomers to be distributed in groups like islands in
archipelagoes. At first some were observed to be bar-shaped, but
later these too were found to be of the characteristic lens
shape. It also emerged that, like the Milky Way, the Andromeda
galaxy had two attendant patches of stars, dust and interstellar
gas to match the Magellanic Clouds. Not only that, the estimated
star-count was found to be similar. A main difference was that
there appeared to be more new stars or novae in that galaxy than
in the Milky Way. This was to be expected, since light takes
time to travel from one galaxy to the next so that the Andromeda
galaxy as now seen appears as it was sometime in the past.
With the advent of ever
larger and more powerful telescopes - the 200-in. telescope at
Mount Palomar, U.S.A., for instance - the size of the Universe
known to man grew ever more vast. Soon more than a million
galaxies were estimated to be visible, those nearest to the
observer bearing a resemblance to the Milky Way but those
farther off appearing to be at a much more primitive stage of
development. Later estimates gave a figure of 100,000 million.
Wherever astronomers looked, they saw a string of galaxies
likened to a series of islands stretching away one behind
another into the infinite distance.
Many difficulties were
encountered in measuring the distance between the various
galaxies, and widely differing estimates were made. Because at
first they were thought to be much nearer, the more distant
galaxies were estimated to be smaller than those closer to the
Milky Way. Even the distance between the Earth and the Andromeda
galaxy was wrongly estimated at first and it was only in 1952
that the error was discovered. The Andromeda galaxy was found to
be twice as far away in space as previously estimated. This
meant that not only was that galaxy twice as large, but so were
all the others; and these too were twice as far away. The
telescope was reaching 2,000 million light-years into space.
Space was eight times more vast than previously estimated. The
most distant visible galaxy was 5,000 million light-years away
and the limit was not yet in sight.
The magnitude of these
initial errors can be appreciated when it is remembered that the
Andromeda galaxy was originally estimated to be 19 light-years
away. A later estimate gave 650,000 light- years and since then
yet another estimate has been made giving the distance as
"something approaching two million light years" (1961). It seems
by no means certain that this will not itself be superseded.
differences in development between the various galaxies
presented less difficulty to astronomers: in all cases they
could be accounted for by the time it took light to travel to
Earth. Through a telescope each galaxy was seen at that stage of
development which would have been reached by the Milky Way the
equivalent number of millions of years ago.
One phenomenon which had puzzled observers since the beginning
was the apparent recession of the more distant galaxies.
The distances between Earth and the nearest galaxies were
estimated by observing certain stars known as the Cepheid
Variables, sometimes called "pulsars". These are stars whose
brightness is seen to vary or "pulsate" over a period of time.
They were found to be relatively common in the Milky Way, less
so in the Andromeda galaxy, while the next nearest galaxy had
fewer still, and so on. However, a sufficient number of these
Cepheids was seen in each of the other galaxies to enable them
to be used as a basis for the estimation of distances. For
example, a ten-day period of pulsation would result in a
luminosity 950 times greater than that of the Sun. It was found
that by estimating how far away a Cepheid must be to reduce it
to the faintest point of light, the distance between Earth and
that star could be calculated: this was the distance from Earth
of its galaxy.
Regarding the nearer galaxies, no overwhelming difficulties
seemed to be encountered. It was in measuring the distances of
the outer galaxies that unreality seemed to supervene and
inexplicable phenomena appeared. It was discovered that the
farther the telescope penetrated, the greater the speed at which
the galaxies appeared to be receding, until ultimately it was
thought that only an initial explosion could have been the
cause. It was estimated that the galaxies were separating to
double their original distances apart in 1,300 million years.
What astronomers were observing which led them to this
conclusion was a progressive and measurable reddening - a
shifting of the spectrum of the distant galaxies towards the
red. Given what are regarded as normal conditions - i.e. those
obtained on or near the Earth, this is caused by the Doppler
effect of a receding velocity. The light- waves from a receding
object do not all reach the observer as quickly as they would if
the object had remained still, and the reduced frequency gives,
in accordance with the Quantum Theory, less light. The reduction
of light reaching the observer gives a reddening effect - hence
the redness of the more distant galaxies.
Various theories were put forward connecting the "red shift"
with the distances between the galaxies and Earth and the rate
at which the galaxies were receding.
The problem with the theory of the receding galaxies was that,
as more and more distant galaxies came into telescopic range,
the difference in the red light emitted by them was such that
each more distant layer of galaxies appeared to be receding
faster than the last.
It is irrelevant here to go into the various mathematical
theories involved. Even Einstein resorted to altering the
algebra to make it agree with what was apparently happening. But
still every new batch of galaxies captured by the ever more
powerful long-range telescopes was found to be receding faster
than the last. It had apparently not occurred to anybody
concerned that although they were being observed from Earth, the
conditions in and the nature of outer space were unknown to
science. Few seemed to doubt that the Universe was expanding,
but the truth was that the reasons put forward for the "red
shift" were, like all theories, subject to revision in the light
of new knowledge.
in the 1930s, cosmic rays were coming into notice and
astronomers were beginning to ask such questions as, where was
all the radiation going which was apparently continuously being
poured into space? Was it too disappearing outwards?
Astronomers concentrated on accounting for the now generally
accepted explosive or expansive nature of the Universe. The
Solar System and the galaxies were compared with the atom: the
similarity was obvious. Mathematically the cosmical constant was
found to be a feature of all these systems. Everywhere from the
atom to the Solar System it was found to be positive. But in an
expanding Universe, this constant would have to be negative.
This was the only way to account for its apparent action not as
a binding force but as its opposite, a scattering force. The
algebra was altered to fit in with what was seen to be
Another theory which arose was called the "ghost theory" or the
"soap-bubble Universe". Light going out from our galaxy was said
to travel not in straight lines but in vast curves, returning to
the Milky Way millions of years later, giving the observer a
picture of the Milky Way at some earlier stage. As this would be
going on all of time ad infinitum, it would account for the
millions of galaxies being observed.
It did not, however, account for the increasing speeds of
Yet another explanation was that originally all the galaxies
were concentrated into one small but very dense mass. Given the
estimated differing speeds at which the galaxies were now
travelling, the theory was that when the dense mass exploded,
some galaxies travelled faster than others and these were the
ones which were now farthest away. However, nothing could be
found to account for such an initial variation in speeds.
The unanswered question central to all theories was that of the
cause of the expansion or explosion. It was known that the force
of attraction between the materials of the Universe would be
stronger than an explosive effect, and thus it was seen that
something else would be needed to counteract and exceed this in
order to start an expansion with such violence and cause it to
continue outward at ever-increasing speeds. No force could be
found in ordinary dynamics which could do that. As far as I know
it was not suggested that the force might come from somewhere
beyond the farthest galaxies.
Nevertheless they now began to penetrate even deeper into space
by means of the new radio telescopes. Powerful sources of
radiation were discovered far beyond the range of the most
powerful optical telescopes. Various theories as to the origin
of this radiation were put forward, including that each source
represented a collision between galaxies at high speeds. These
mysterious sources were given the name "quasars" (quasi-stellar
At the same time opposing theories arose to explain the still
puzzling explosive character of the Universe. One was the "Big
Bang" theory. According to this all the galaxies originated in
one big "super-star" which exploded, hurling the galaxies
outward quasi-stellar radio sources so that one day they will
all disappear from the center to leave empty space.
The "Steady State" theory of continuous creation opposed the
idea of an explosion. It was however admitted that the outer
galaxies would one day disappear, and to compensate for this,
creation of hydrogen atoms must go on all of the time. Thus, the
average density of the Universe would be kept constant.
This concept of a "steady state" appears to leave room for the
existence of Eternity but does not explain infinity - the
enormous number of galaxies seen or detected.
According to both theories the outer galaxies are believed to be
receding at ever-increasing speeds the farther the telescope
penetrates into space. Nobody seems to have been able to suggest
where the galaxies go or what happens to them when they
disappear. According to the "Steady State" theory, they could
conceivably disintegrate into interstellar gas and re-emerge as
the hydrogen atoms apparently needed to keep the Universe in
It has been suggested that apart from the Creation as described
in the Bible, these are the only two possible theories.
A comparatively recent suggestion is that the Universe is
expanding and contracting alternately: once every so many
million years the whole mass is sucked back into a star of
immense density, which later explodes and re-forms the whole
This it seems would be an extraordinarily wasteful process and
quite out of character with nature and the Universe as they are
known, where nothing is wasted. No less wasteful, of course, is
the whole concept of the "disappearing galaxies". In fact, no
astronomer has ever caught a galaxy in the act of disappearing.
One of the few people who questioned the theory of expansion was
Sir James Jeans, and he did it at the outset. As long ago as the
1930s he was voicing his opinions, but only because at that time
the age of the Universe had been calculated to be comparatively
young. He could not see that it could be only a few thousands of
millions of years old as the receding galaxies visible at that
time seemed to indicate, and added that for this reason he felt
that the "apparent recessions" would "prove to be spurious".
After Jeans wrote those words, a theory concerning matter and
antimatter arose. Small quantities of antimatter had been found
in existence on Earth for short periods: it was very unstable
because of its attraction for matter, with which it combined to
destroy both itself and the matter concerned, with a release of
energy. It was this discovery which gave rise to the idea of an
antimatter system somewhere out in space and the stories of the
possible disappearance of spacemen who might venture too far and
meet their antimatter opposite.
Antimatter, it was thought, would have opposite electrical
properties to those of matter, but similar gravitational
properties. (This is highly improbable, however. Electrons would
have to be implosive and this would mean they would be in the
nucleus.) Because of their strong mutual attraction, it was
thought that matter and antimatter would have to be in separate
star systems or perhaps even in separate galaxies. In such a
system or galaxy everything would have to be exactly similar to
the Solar System or to the Milky Way.
Meanwhile, further research into outer space has indicated that
there appears, after all, to be a limit to the Universe. This is
seen as an apparently impenetrable wall, which could indicate
where space ends.
Furthermore, the omnipresence of radiation began to take on a
new significance. A network of radiation permeating the whole
Universe has been detected by Russian scientists and its
increased intensity in living things has been investigated.
the same time, what was once thought to be empty space has been
found to contain electrons travelling in spirals.
This being so, it is possible that it may provide us with a
fifth dimension which may be the cause of many unexplained
phenomena but which up to the present time has never been taken
The presence of small
quantities of antimatter on Earth and the properties they
exhibited seemed to indicate that there must be, somewhere else,
a great concentration of antimatter. Since matter and antimatter
are attracted to one another and when they meet, mutual
destruction takes place, leaving only energy, and since energy
is in all things, it would appear that at some time in the past
matter and antimatter separated from each other. Somewhere in
the Universe must be the antimatter Earth with its antimatter
moon, its antimatter continents and oceans, its antimatter
plants, animals, and people. Where in the Universe could we
expect to find this antimatter Earth? Perhaps the best way to
look for it would be to take advantage of the light coming from
the distant galaxies, some of which would be seen at the point
of the division of one star from another. What we find, of
course, is apparent doubling or twinning of whole galaxies -
what at one time were thought to be galaxies colliding far back
in time. Was this, then, how our galaxy came into being from
Looking at the question from another viewpoint, if we suppose
that in the creation of matter from primeval energy, antimatter
had to be formed as a by-product, a second galaxy made entirely
of antimatter would have to be formed and held apart from the
Milky Way by a force strong enough to overcome the force of
attraction between the two. The existence of this second
antimatter galaxy would be in accordance with the law of nature
and the Universe whereby nothing is wasted. The antimatter thus
thrown off must still be in existence somewhere as a galaxy
exactly like our own. The question is, where should we look for
Of all the millions of galaxies now visible with the aid of a
modern telescope, those which are nearer are easiest to examine,
and that which is visible with the naked eye in the
constellation of Andromeda, being the nearest of these, is
easiest of all. If it is the twin to the Milky Way, we would
expect it to appear in every respect to resemble it. In only one
respect can it differ from the Milky Way, and that is in the
ability of its living creatures to think. This ability stems
from the concentration of primeval energy as part of the network
investing the Universe and not only is this capable of varying,
it is more likely to be present in the product than in the
by-product. Moreover, its presence in the Milky Way exclusively
can be confirmed by examination of our own kind, most of whom
have never heard of an antimatter Earth, and certainly are not
conscious of being in two places at the same time.
As it happens, the question of the concentration of thought
energy in the Milky Way rather than in the Andromeda galaxy does
not affect our investigation, since distances are too great and
the time-span too long for these to be of any use. Fortunately
there are enough similarities between the two galaxies to
convince an observer in the Milky Way that the Andromeda Galaxy
is what he is looking for. That it is so far away - two million
light-years - is accounted for by the great space which must be
maintained between matter and antimatter to render
disintegration through mutual attraction impossible. The
observer, then, must look for similarities which are easily
visible from a great distance and which in the Milky Way are not
subject to change - basic shape, star-count estimate, formation
of the trailing arms, diameter, development of stars - always
allowing for the time required for light to travel between the
two galaxies. The answers appear all to be in the affirmative:
the main differences are in development and are accounted for by
our having to observe the galaxy as it was in the past.
Above all the galaxy would, if it was twin to the Milky Way, be
attended by two counterparts to the Magellanic Clouds which are
outside and yet a part of the Milky Way. Such clouds of stars
have been found to be present just outside the Andromeda galaxy.
Ignoring for the time being all the other millions of galaxies
apparently streaming away from the Milky Way in all directions,
we can now state that our Universe has two parts, one made of
matter and the other, exactly like it in every visible respect,
made of antimatter. This means that over there in the faint
cloud seen in the constellation of Andromeda, two million
light-years away, is a solar system exactly like our own and
that before the division the two were one; that they are still
connected in space and time by strands of radiation so that all
that happens here happens simultaneously over there, thus
preserving the perfect balance needed to prevent mutual
destruction. Around that antimatter Sun circulate exactly the
same number of planets, each identical with our Sun's planets,
some attended by a moon or moons as in the Solar System in the
Milky Way. On each planet and each moon is duplicated everything
down to the tiniest particle of matter, the Earth and all that
is in, on or around it, every living plant and animal down to
the tiniest unicellular organism in a drop of water. Nothing is
left out. As a creature moves on earth, so, over there, does its
antimatter equivalent two million light-years away. In the
antimatter version of any average home is an antimatter kitchen
with an antimatter family perhaps, automatically and without
conscious thought, eating its antimatter dinner while an
antimatter cat sits purring on its antimatter chair or an
antimatter dog gnaws its antimatter bone. There are also, of
course, antimatter babies being born, antimatter murders and
antimatter wars as well as antimatter airlines, space-craft and
atomic explosions. Since, in order to maintain a perfect state
of balance, all must be interconnected by strands of radiation,
it may be that disturbances on Earth do more harm in the
Universe at large than we had imagined possible. What happens in
one galaxy controls or is dependent upon what happens in the
Apart from being connected to each other across the intervening
space, they must also be connected far back in time to the mass
of primeval energy that gave them birth, whose energy remains in
both galaxies today and is easily detectable on and around the
Thus two galaxies can be proved to exist, both having arisen
from the same mother-galaxy which contained both matter and
antimatter, probably in a very unstable state, constantly
separating and re-combining so that at that far-off primeval
stage, no life could have existed. Outside these two galaxies
and between them is space which has been found to contain a
plasma composed of electrons travelling in spirals. What, then,
is the significance of all the other galaxies seen to be rushing
away from us at ever-increasing speeds?
Nothing has been found to account for this increase in speed
which, given an exploding primeval mass, is not what one would
expect to find. If anything, a slowing-down would be expected.
Is it possible that what astronomers are seeing or detecting is
an illusion? If so, what might have caused it? Could it have
been caused by the earlier behaviour of the primeval energy from
which the Universe was formed? One cannot help but get the
impression that what is there is no more than a vast "hall of
mirrors" and in fact an experiment to produce this effect may
easily be set up in the laboratory using nothing but a single
object and a number of mirrors.
Through the telescope we look into a vast celestial hall of
mirrors, each galaxy infinitely reflected or at any rate
duplicated as far as the telescope can penetrate, seen to lie
all around us rather than "behind" because of the circular
movements of Earth, the Solar System, and our galaxy. One may
compare it to the recurring number in mathematics - the
mathematical concept of infinity. In fact, however, the "mirror"
analogy does not altogether apply, for the farther out into
space the telescope penetrates, the more primitive the galaxies
appear to be, until double or dividing galaxies are seen and
finally only "sources of energy" or quasars are found - and now,
apparently, a baffling, impenetrable wall. If what is seen does
not exactly fit in with the theory which it is supposed governs
it, then there is usually something wrong with the theory and it
is more productive to look for another. In considering the more
distant galaxies, no theory so far advanced is applicable in
every respect to what is seen. The cosmical constant had to be
made negative - a scattering force - to account for the red
shift. The increasing speed after the initial explosion proved
to be inexplicable; and then there was the problem of what
happened to the disappearing galaxies and why none had been seen
actually doing so.
Perhaps it might
be more productive to try to trace the development of a galaxy
from the initial "source of energy" through division and the
emergence of a pair of galaxies like our own.
What is found is that the vibrations present in the initial
source or mass of energy are much faster than the speed of
light. It is possible, then, that what is being seen through the
telescope far out in space and back in time is what was once
there but is now here. This could have come about, not through
the ever-increasing velocity of receding galaxies, but by the
exact opposite: a slowing down from the enormous vibratory
speeds of primeval energy - that same energy which holds our
pair of galaxies apart and yet maintains connection between them
and which invests the entire universe with strands of radiation;
which also concentrates itself into living creatures and which,
travelling in spirals, accounts for the existence of "plasma" in
what was once thought to be empty space.
Thus from its earliest beginnings the Universe has existed, not
only in the three spatial dimensions of length, breadth height
and the fourth dimension of time, but in a fifth dimension which
came before all the others: radiation.
Looking at things from the viewpoint of an observer on Earth it
will be seen that once a speed exceeding that of light is
reached by a moving object, if that were possible, then that
object would soon be in more than one place at the same time -
in other words, time and space would disappear. Reverse this
process and we have a possible explanation as to how space, time
and our two galaxies arose from the matrix of primeval energy
which exists where there is no space or time, in Eternity.
It is not likely that our galaxy would collide with its
counterpart, but if this did happen the result would be mutual
destruction and the release of primeval energy to form a single
unstable galaxy. The balance would still be maintained, though
altered, and all life would be destroyed.
If we imagine such a thing to be possible, a man, if he
travelled far enough out into space, must ultimately meet his
anti-matter equivalent, for as one advances into space, so must
the other. Both would flash out in mutual destruction, leaving
behind a single mass of energy. It is interesting that in order
to reverse the process and recreate the two - the man and his
antimatter counterpart - something extra would be needed,
otherwise only the non-living matter and antimatter would
result. What seems here to be needed is the radiation which has
been found to concentrate itself in living things and which was
present in the man when he met his antimatter counterpart;
indeed there seems to be no way of recreating a man thus
destroyed in an instant, except by re-creating his entire past
from a single cell or cells upwards to the complex organism he
was when he went out into space. The reason for this is that
when a man travels so far, he travels also far back in time, and
it is to be supposed that long before he reached his counterpart
both would have recapitulated their entire past. All this would,
in theory, have to be lived through again in order to achieve
re-creation. Fortunately such a meeting is highly unlikely ever
In order to better understand the Universe, we have to look at
it from the viewpoint of Eternity. From this viewpoint, the
Universe as we know it actually still is all the earlier
versions which can be seen infinitely repeated in space and
time. In other words, infinity is only an illusion created by
space and time: what is really there is Eternity. The
"impenetrable wall" recently discovered is probably the
"eternity-barrier" which must form the limits of space and time.
Here, then, is no "soap-bubble" Universe such as results from
the theory of curved light-waves; here is no destructive
explosion requiring a force unknown in dynamics and
foreshadowing a violent end to all life. The cosmical constant
is seen in its true sense everywhere as a binding force and we
have a concept of the Universe opening up like a flower in the
eternal matrix and of life both infinite and eternal. The extra
dimension in which we find ourselves living is essentially one
of thought -one which gives life new meaning and opens up
Perhaps most important of all, the fifth dimension puts man back
at the centre of things where, as a thinking being, he should
be, and relieves him of that sense of his own insignificance and
of the futility of life, to which he seemed to be condemned by
other recent theories.
Perhaps one of the most
difficult aspects of the study of the development of our
galaxies within the matrix of Eternity is that of understanding
what it is like to be in Eternity instead of in space and time
as we find ourselves to be. We persist in regarding our
existence on Earth and the conditions here as normal and
applicable not only to the entire galaxy but to whatever lies
outside it, even though evidence is constantly coming in which
points the other way. We still try to assess what is outside our
immediate vicinity in terms which in most cases only apply with
any certainty to Earth. Moreover, it is taken for granted that
space is in every way constant in all parts of the Universe and
that time does not vary, when again evidence may point the other
How many people when asked the question, "How much space does
space take up?" would answer "None"? Yet this is the true and
correct answer, for space takes up the spiralling vibrations of
Eternity - not more space.
If we start from a viewpoint within space and time, it is almost
impossible to understand how our galaxies came into being.
Instead, we find ourselves stuck with such illusions as the
"expanding universe" and the "hall of mirrors" effect, for
which the only explanation seems to be that the Universe is
exploding and the most distant galaxies disappearing.
Unless we can overcome these difficulties, we risk getting
bogged down in a proliferation of useless and improbable
theories, much as the ancients did when they believed the Earth
was flat and that travellers who ventured too far would fall off
the edge into an abyss.
observer situated in Eternity is outside space and time and
exists in only one of the five dimensions known to man, and that
the least understood: radiation. Length, breadth, height and
time do not exist as we know them, or, if they do, they occur
now here, now there within the matrix of Eternity. What
conditions are necessary for such an observer to be able to look
at space and time and whatever is contained therein?
First, it may help if we establish how it is possible to break
through the barrier of space-time and Eternity and look back
into space. To do this, the observer must lose four of the
dimensions in which he has been living and retain only one -
radiation*. This radiation is
a part of that which forms the plasma in space and the network
which invests the entire Universe and which has been found to
concentrate itself in living things. Its electrical activity has
been studied and measured by scientists working on the brain and
nervous system and has been found to cease when the animal dies.
on this later in "A Sixth Dimension" chapter - pattern is
however, irrelevant here.
In Eternity not only is it impossible for a plant or an animal
to exist as such, it is also unnecessary. Everything there is
based on energy - the same kind of energy that scientists have
found to be active when we think - and its vibrations, which
must produce a set of dimensions peculiar to the environment.
These conditions are virtually unknown to us and we can only
guess at them in the light of the small amount of information
Scientists and others on Earth are working on theories which
assume that every individual, every thing and every event has
its own radiation - differences depending on the rate of
vibration. There are probably other differences as yet
Two friends living in Eternity and wishing to meet will not be
able to communicate or to seem to get near to each other unless
each alters his vibrations until they come close enough.
In the same way, in order to peer into space the observer must
slow down his vibrations until space opens up for him. When this
happens, he will see in the bright, shimmering matrix of
Eternity, which may perhaps be likened to the aurora borealis,
small, dark, elliptical opening of apparently infinite depth.
That it will be elliptical is to be expected because of the
elliptical orbits observed, for instance, in the solar system.
Its motion and that of everything within it will be spiral and
elliptical. Because time is within the space in Eternity, we may
call such openings time-slots.
The observer may, if he wishes, create his own time and space,
that is to say his own small individual time-slot. This he does
by inducing conditions of lack of relative motion. Thus, where
the spiralling vibrations are slowed down, time is created and a
time-slot containing space is formed as a by-product of time. In
other words, time induces space.
Either way, the ability to peer into a time-slot is confined to
the point where the vibrations in Eternity have decreased until
they approach those of a time-system, that is to say at the
point of entry or exit. In order to enter, further slowing-down
will be needed. Only below the speed of light does space travel
It will be seen that our two friends trying to arrange a meeting
in Eternity will, once they have met, have to slow down
sufficiently to form their own private time-slot, otherwise they
will have no time for conversation.
Since space may be formed as a by-product of time, it follows
that time may be induced by the creation of space. The result,
however, would be less satisfactory. The concept of time within
space gives us one time spiral within the particular time-slot.
Space with time as a by-product is quite a different matter:
various time-spirals will tend to occur in peripheral areas as
they come in at random from the matrix of Eternity and so all
the activity will be at the sides while the centre remains
empty. The tendency for this "wild time" to exist in peripheral
areas is present in any time-slot because radiation will always
come in from Eternity, but where a main time-system exists in
which, for instance, a galaxy develops, its effect will be
comparatively negligible. It may be partly responsible for some
of the many optical illusions observed by astronomers. But this
is of course a very large time-slot, permeated with the plasma
which has come in from Eternity and containing many subsidiary
time-slots arranged in a very complex fashion. The Sun has one
of its own and so must every planet; and this is repeated for
every star in the Milky Way.
The pre-requisite for matter and antimatter galaxies to come
into being is, then, the time-slot. Once such a concept exists,
primeval energy may be introduced into it and the slowing-down
continued until it is possible to separate matter from
It has been observed that
everything has its opposite or negative equivalent. Since we
have positive and negative electricity, we tend to look for
positive and negative radiation. We observe that while radiation
coming from sunlight and from outer space is mainly helpful to
life, that which comes from nuclear explosions tends to have the
opposite effect and is harmful.
Unfortunately a confusion arises here because electric current,
which involves the passage of electrons, has been given for
convenience a negative value and electrons are said to be
negatively charged, while the nuclear force, which is implosive,
is termed positive, which gives a positive value to the cosmical
After this terminology had become established, thought-impulses
were found to be of an electrical nature, as is indeed all the
inter-connecting radiation in the Universe. This means that a
negative electrical charge is concerned.
To keep in line, then, with the terminology already in use, we
have to refer to the electrical nature of the radiation coming
in from the matrix of Eternity as "negative", while nuclear
radiation is electrically "positive". But it is the
negatively-charged radiation which is expansive and has
positive, health-giving effects, while the positively-charged
nuclear radiation is implosive and, although useful as a
binding-force if kept under control, has negative, harmful
effects on living things.
This brings us to the question of mutations. These are changes
in the genetic make-up of living things.
(click) Detailed studies have
been made by scientists to establish exactly what happens to the
chromosomes and their genes within the nuclei of plant and
animal cells when affected by radiation and other experimental
manipulation. Much of the latter is artificial, not found in
nature, and so does not concern us here. But genetic changes,
whatever their cause, are permanent and inheritable.
The genetic changes found in nature were formerly thought to be spontaneous
- that is, they were then regarded as being of uncertain origin. When the first experiments with nuclear radiation were
carried out, it was found to cause not only ill health and even
death, but various mutations in plants and animals. All these
were found to be unfavorable to life. However, a study of
evolution had shown that in the history of life on Earth, most
mutations were beneficial, furthering evolution from the
simplest unicellular plants and animals to the complex organisms
with which we are familiar today. Clearly the radiation which
was normally available for absorption by living things was very
different from that which was normally locked away within each
atom and, with few exceptions, liberated only in the artificial
conditions of atomic fission.
Many experiments have been done and continue to be done with
plants and animals, involving the necessary "controls" to whom
no radiation is given, and all lead to the same conclusion: two
kinds of radiation exist, one being beneficial to life, the
Experiments have been done involving praying over plants and
even by cursing them. The plants who had received the beneficial
radiation or thought energy which we call prayer were observed
to thrive, while those receiving curses grew small and
This explains why some gardeners are said to have a "green
thumb" - they are people who love their gardens and the plants
they grow. In the same way it has been found that animals thrive
better if they receive the love of their owners.
would, then, appear that thought in the form of prayer or love
has a similar effect to that of the radiation coming in from the
matrix of Eternity. At this point, I should underline that the
Sun's radiation, like all other radiation within the time-slot,
has the same origin.
The presence of two kinds of radiation, beneficial and harmful
to life, is integral to matter and to the atomic concept.
It has long been
established that every atom is composed of one or more
negatively-charged electrons revolving in an elliptical path
around a nucleus with an equal and opposite electrical charge
whose binding-force attracts the electrons and holds them. In
the same way the moon is held by the gravitational field of the
Earth and revolves around it, as the Earth, together with the
other planets, are held and revolve around the Sun. The
binding-force involved has been found to be mathematically
constant throughout the Universe and is known as the cosmical
constant. In the case of the atom it is the nuclear material
which exerts this binding-force. It is reasonable to suppose
that in the case of the gravitational field of the Earth, the
Sun, and the galaxy itself, where the same cosmical constant
exists, nuclear material is again involved.
The Earth is sometimes likened to a magnet because of its
polarity. Just as a magnet may be used to induce magnetism in
another piece of potentially magnetic metal, so has it been
induced in nature by the Earth's magnetic field.
If the Earth were simply a magnet, however, only such substances
as iron would be attracted and remain held to its surface, while
everything else would long ago have been lost by flying off into
space. This does not happen in the case of any of the heavenly
bodies - in fact, they not only do not behave as magnets, they
actually behave as atomic nuclei. The main difference between a
star or a planet and an atomic nucleus is, apart from size, that
in the atom the nuclear material is exposed. However, there is
present in the nucleus other material which is often ignored
because it lacks an electrical charge. The proton with its
positive electrical charge balances the electron; the neutron,
largest of these additional nuclear particles, seems to have no
function unless one or more in excess of the number of protons
is present, which gives isotopes or modified varieties of the
original substance. It may also be that the neutrons act as a
barrier between the protons and the electrons. If this is so,
the analogy between the Earth and the atom becomes more
complete. In the case of the Earth, the center, which exerts the
same gravitational pull as does the atomic nucleus - or rather,
the protons in that nucleus - would be composed of a mass of
nuclear material covered by the Earth's crust and other
electrically neutral layers composed of atoms. This mass of
nuclear material would be expected to attract free electrons as
well as the electrons of the atoms in the outer layers, so that
atomic instability would be found in those layers nearer to the
center while at the same time free electrons would be attracted
The concentration of electrons over the north pole of the Earth
would indicate that there is more nuclear material - a greater
concentration of positively-charged protons - in that part of
the globe. A pear-shaped Earth with a pear-shaped core would
have this effect.
Recently the astronauts, by photographing the Earth from the
moon, have shown us that the Earth is indeed inclined to be
pear-shaped as is indicated by the behaviour of the free
electrons over the North Pole. Moreover, it has been proven that
the Sun is based on nuclear fusion.
The Earth, then, may be likened to a huge multiple atom, the
core being a multiple proton whose pull gives the Earth its
gravitational field. Neutrons and other smaller neutral
particles must also be present, perhaps particularly in the
outer parts of the nucleus, while outside the nucleus substances
in atomic form are found, in the inner layers less stable.
Permeating the Earth's crust and extending into the atmosphere
beyond it are clouds of free electrons, whose electrical charges
balance those of the protons at the centre.
has been found that the atoms of all substances are capable of
reduction to energy: when atoms are split, energy is liberated,
together with nuclear material and various by-products such as
new atoms which differ from the original, some comparatively
simple, others more complex.
The atom-splitting formula
is generally understood to be E=Mc▓, the letter M representing
mass (to all intents and purposes the same as weight) and the
letter c the speed of light, while E represents the energy
produced. What actually happens when an atom is split is better
expressed by this equation in reverse, Mc▓=E. It will be seen
that a very high speed is involved, the speed of light
multiplied by itself. The energy produced is primeval energy,
the stuff of creation and, this being unstable, it at once
begins to re-create matter. At this stage, the formula E=Mc▓ is
applicable, but only partly. There is evidence that differing
speeds are involved, some of them ranging above c▓, so that a
more accurate way to write the formula would be E=Mcⁿ.
modified formula covers all kinds of creation including the
creation of life. In other words, E=Mcⁿ is the formula for the
creation of the Universe from primeval energy, which vibrates at
a higher speed than that of what it creates.
The life created in an atomic explosion is of course of the
simplest kind, such as evidence shows was the case when the
Universe was first created. What probably happens after the
atoms are split is that some of the energy produced is lost to
recreation of matter - i.e. that where the correct speed of
vibration is present, while yet more, which happens to reach the
speed needed for the creation of life, is taken up in creating
complicated proteins which act as simple viruses. The difference
between a protein and a virus would appear to be that the virus
is capable of absorbing primeval energy.
The concept of stars and planets as huge multiple atoms may
explain the existence in the galaxy of the so-called black
(click) A black hole may contain, not a collapsed star, but a
strongly implosive multiple nucleus, and in Cygnus X-1 a stage
has been reached where there are enough electrons to balance the
nuclear material present. After a while, when sufficient
absorption has taken place, the pair will be seen as a binary
star - the last stage before total absorption by the former
black hole and the formation of a single new star.
Time travel is not
possible in Eternity: No time. But, within a time-slot, it may
take place. In order to travel forward in time, faster
vibrations are needed than those normal to the time-slot, and
these must follow the vibrations common to all time systems as
they go forward in time, turning from west to east or in a
clockwise direction, but to come back, reverse vibrations are
needed. By going into reverse first, i.e. in a counter-clockwise
direction, the time traveller leaves his own time to form a new
time system which travels faster but does not take him so far
into the future as would be expected at that speed. To come back
to normal, he must turn forward again, in a clockwise direction.
He feels he has been away a long time but finds that the hands
of the clock have moved comparatively little. This we may call
expanded time; the effect is that normal time is warped.
all time travel very high speeds are involved, many times the
speed of light. At a higher speed than that needed for expanded
time, travel farther into the future is possible and the
observer would then come back with definite impressions of some
future event, which he could accurately foretell. This may
explain the phenomenon of clairvoyance, though exactly how this
happens is not yet clear.
To travel into the past, counter-clockwise direction is needed,
and in this case the time traveller is taken back and seems to
re-live some event in history. Once again time has been gained.
Dreams of past or of future events may be explained by a form of
time-travel. It is possible that during sleep part of the
radiation concentrated in all living things may escape,
remaining attached to the body by a strand of radiation. If the
vibrations are then increased, it may, by altering direction,
travel into the past; in the same way it may also travel into
the future. Either way, on returning to the body, it will give
dream-like memories of another time.
It is also possible to produce conditions of Eternity within a
time system. This is done by substituting fast oscillations,
first in one direction, then in the other, for the more usual
onward spiral - that is to say the time-traveller behaves as he
would if he were outside the time-slot in Eternity. The
vibrations of Eternity, though based on the spiral, have to be
oscillatory or time would occur.
is thought by astronomers that Venus turns backwards. Others
state that they have observed that Venus turns first in one
direction, then in the other, while it has even been said that
it does not turn at all. Both Venus and Uranus are shrouded in
mist and it is possible that Uranus too exhibits such
peculiarities. The nature of the mist does not appear to have
been discovered, partly because of the high temperatures on
Venus which are thought to have been responsible for the
destruction of the spacecraft which have landed there. These
high temperatures may indicate that the cloud is composed of
electrons vibrating at high speeds such as are found in the
matrix of Eternity. If this is so, it may also account for the
varying observations made by astronomers. In that case, Venus,
and possibly Uranus too, would be directly connected by strong
strands of radiation to the matrix of Eternity outside the
time-slot and would tend to act as if it was outside. This would
modify the spiralling motion which of necessity occurs in a time
system and one would expect that the planet either turns first
one way, then the other, or else not at all. In fact, it might be
expected to oscillate at very high speeds, which would give some
very interesting phenomena in the Venutian sky, such as, for
instance, shimmering, and possibly crinkled rainbows.
Unfortunately, the spacecraft which landed there did not stay in
existence long enough to record any of these effects.
If the clouds around Venus really are made up of electrons and
connected directly to the matrix of Eternity, the differing
impressions recorded by astronomers would be caused by the
presence of wild time in the outer layers.
we have noted earlier, the time-slot containing our Universe is
an exceptionally large and complex one, which required an
enormous amount of primeval energy to create the main time
spiral and to cause it to divide into two, one branch for the
Milky Way and the other for the Andromeda galaxy. The presence
of plasma or clouds of electrons of varying density within the
time-slot predisposes the creation of wild time here and there
throughout the Universe. This may be the reason for the
"time-warp" scientists have discovered to exist in space. Space
travel has been found to involve time travel, but the traveller
within the time-slot would see many strange optical illusions.
Some of these effects must be very beautiful. Anyone who has
been entranced by the glories of the aurora borealis with its
shimmering colors and shafts of light will have some idea of
what it might be like out there in space. Astronauts have
already commented on the beauty of the Earth when seen from a
distance and have brought back photographs to prove it.
A time traveller would experience additional wonders. By
reversing his vibrations and travelling backwards in time, he
could bring himself at will to any past era of history. This
would certainly give historians a far greater insight -
especially if they were social historians; and many well-kept
secrets would be exposed and insoluble mysteries unravelled. We
might then discover whether the Russian royal family actually
did all die at the hands of Lenin's supporters in 1917, who Jack
the Ripper really was, who constructed the so-called money-pit
on Oak Island and who really discovered North and South America.
Meanwhile, it is possible that the people living at the time in
history to which he had travelled might have seen a ghost from
the future in the same way as people sometimes see ghosts from
Not all of us see ghosts: to do so requires strong radiation
from both sides. It is also better if it is spiralling towards
us - not away into the future. For us to see a ghost from the
future, much stronger radiation is needed to overcome the
Nearly everybody who sees a ghost is frightened by the
is partly because we know the person concerned is actually dead
and partly because ghosts, over the centuries, have acquired a
bad name. Because not everybody sees them, they are sometimes
also regarded as figment of the imagination. Some people even
pity those who are "plagued" in this way. The pity is misplaced:
the ability to see ghosts is not a sign of weakness but a sign
of strength. It simply means that the radiation is strong.
explanation for the appearance of ghosts is a comparatively
simple one. It all stems from the spiralling motion within the
matrix of Eternity as it enters the time-slot. In Eternity,
because there is no time, all events are present, as are all
things and all living things, each with its own individual
radiation. Thus, in Eternity, a spiral passes through the same
event over and over and this principle affects the spiral within
the time-slot. As the Earth goes around the Sun in its
elliptical course, it is not only passing through the time-slot
but is also present in the matrix of Eternity where it came into
being. Therefore it passes annually through old radiations from
previous years. Thus it is to be expected that when the scene of
an old event comes back to the date on which it occurred,
impressions of that event will be present and perhaps
Most such impressions pass unnoticed for two reasons: the
radiations of the event may not be strong enough and the
observer may also be weak in radiation. But given an event with
very strong radiations from the past and a sensitive observer,
the ghostly scene will appear and be silently re-enacted.
Unfortunately one of the strongest forms of radiation is that of
death, especially sudden death which of course, involves the
sudden withdrawal into Eternity of the concentration of
radiation which has for years occupied the body of the person
concerned. The eerie silence, the transparency, the mechanical
way in which the event unfolds before our eyes to its expected
and inevitable conclusion, and then the sudden disappearance
into thin air or through a wall - all combine to make ghostly
phenomena seem so frightening.
There is however another
form of haunting which is less easy to explain. It sometimes
happens that the radiation which was formerly concentrated in
the body either remains at the scene or is attracted back on the
anniversary, when it makes the ghost seem to be much more alive
and may add noises and other sensations. The radiation of life
is alive and, being thought energy, can think. It actually is
the thinking part of the person who died and, like people under
any other circumstances, may be either harmless or malevolent.
Much has been written on this subject elsewhere, so I will only
add that such a situation may be serious and should never be
Nothing is ever totally destroyed, and although this sometimes
brings about a haunting, it is often comforting to know that
when beauty is replaced by ugliness, as so often seems to happen
in this twentieth century, what once was easily visible is still
there in radiation form and may be seen again, even if only by a
We have seen that it is possible for a traveller from Eternity
to form his own time-slot and time system, and that such time
systems or capsules may exist in space in the vast time-slot
containing our Universe. In theory such a time capsule, since it
contains no planets and hence exerts and is affected by no
gravitational pull, may come quite close to the Earth. We would
therefore expect them to have been viewed at fairly close range
by observers on this planet or in a space-craft. Such an
observer would see a glowing object much like a star, its
vibrations causing it to twinkle. But, it might be much bigger
than an ordinary star; nor could it be mistaken for a planet,
since these do not twinkle. Either it would tend to hover, not
following the usual apparent movement of stars or planets, or it
would act erratically, perhaps suddenly racing across the sky to
take up a new position or to disappear below the horizon. In the
day time such a time capsule would not always emit enough light
for it to be visible, but if it was seen it would appear to be
of the same shape as that of the larger time systems, such as
the galaxies: lens-shaped or saucer-shaped, perhaps even
bar-shaped, depending on the angle from which it was viewed.
the nature of such phenomena has not been understood in the
past, they have been called unidentified flying objects or UFOs.
We have seen what might be observed by a space traveller who was
able to look into a time-slot at the point of entry, but what
would a time system look like within the matrix of Eternity and
viewed, if that were possible, from Earth? Here we have to
remember that the plasma in space is connected to the eternal
matrix outside the main time system and the UFOs which we see
from Earth may be subject to eternal conditions within this
plasma. The observer on Earth would see the
UFO as in motion and
becoming brighter. If two UFOs were within Eternity and visible
from Earth, the observer on Earth would see them as closer
together as their vibratory speeds grew more nearly the same and
further apart if one began to vibrate faster or more slowly than
the other. If they met, the two UFOs would appear to become one,
having formed into a single time-system. Optical illusions
always occur when Eternity is viewed from a time system.
Conversely, viewed from Eternity, space and all that is in it
appears to be no different from any other part of the matrix
because in Eternity is everything that ever was, is, or will be.
Only at the point of entry is it possible to see a time-slot in
the matrix. The rule seems to be that everything viewed from
Eternity is eternal, while everything viewed from within space
appears to be spatial.
Integral to Eternity and
to our Universe are maleness and femaleness, and it will be
observed that these two are basic to the concept of time and
space. In Eternity, maleness in thought leads to the creation of
time. But in order to exist, time must have space, the female
element. All maleness and femaleness in the time-slot comes from
the eternal matrix; they are based on the time spiral and the
space in which it moves. Life developed from these two concepts.
If we consider the development of the embryo we see that in
order to induce the space within the female in which the embryo
can develop, the male has to be the initiator. This may be
observed in the courtship activities of animals. When he has
induced the necessary space he introduces energy into it and
thus the new life has from the start that concentration of
primeval energy which distinguishes living from non-living
things. The energy brought in by the male has to come from the
matrix of Eternity and so it first comes into the time-slot or
womb of creation and then into its own private space to develop
as an embryo.
It is interesting that the cells from which living organisms
develop have an apparent basic "atomic" structure, that of a
sphere with a nucleus - though here the analogy appears to end.
We see then that in Eternity and so in the time-slot the male
element initiates and the female element absorbs and reacts.
Because primeval energy is thought, the new embryo develops in
its thought processes the tendencies of that energy. It has been
proved by experiments on fruit flies that maleness and
femaleness in approach depends on the brain, where even in that
tiny creature the concentration of radiation from the eternal
matrix is found. Thus, a male head on a female body causes the
insect to behave as a male, while a female head on a male body
induces female behaviour.
So, we have male thought patterns which tend to initiate and
female thought patterns which tend to absorb and react. This
gives the male a direct and thrusting habit of thought, and a
tendency to concentrate, to specialize and to learn more and
more about less and less, while the female tends to be a good
learner, absorbing knowledge well: her thought patterns are
diffuse and she ranges far and wide, tending to learn something
about everything. This tends to make an intelligent woman a good
mother and guide to her children.
These are the patterns that tend to develop. In life, there is
usually much femaleness in the male and much maleness in the
female and so in both sexes we find many variations, ranging in
both thought and tendencies from the complete male through to
the complete female. The two also inter-react, each inducing the
opposite or complementary type of thinking in the other. A
balanced relationship results.
Thought shapes events and here direct or male thought tends to
forge ahead. Female thought has the disadvantage of having to
sort itself out, but with effort its diffuse nature can be
overcome. Thought, being radiation, flows first in one
direction, then in another, searching for a solution, until the
most perfect pattern, taking all factors into consideration, is
formed. This becomes the future. Future events within a
time-slot are controlled by the thought coming in from the
matrix of Eternity, part of which is in all living things. Thus
this eternal thought tends to work through the life it creates.
The way in which thought controls the future explains why at any
given moment the future that seems to be coming may be altered.
It alters as the flow changes. Those who are sensitive to flow
tendencies can often predict the future, but because of these
changes do not always predict it accurately.
When problems are being discussed, thought radiation turns now
this way, now that, in the same manner as just described.
The optimum result of these thought tendencies is a condition of
preparedness involving positive thought - and this includes
Being prepared for the future is basic to the Universe and so
the use of thought to shape events is basic to life. Thought
runs into the future and comes up against obstacles. Ultimately
in positive thought the best way wins. Then, the radiation forms
as it were into an arrow-head and pushes forward, the main
stream becoming fact, the subsidiary streams cut off.
Unpreparedness in thought does not involve acting in this way.
It leaves everything to "luck" - that is to say it allows other
thought to come in from outside. The horse-shoe has become the
symbol of such thought because it represents the way it behaves
and the shape of the radiation in cross-section. In fact, a
cup-shape is involved - that is to say, this type of thought
gives a cup-shaped head of radiation containing a space to
accommodate what comes in. Not all that is absorbed by the
waiting cup is beneficial and the cup being female in form
induces diffuse thought so much sorting-out is necessary if the
original thought is not to be turned back by the in-flowing
tide. When this happens, the forward flow has been reversed and
thought becomes negative.
The greatest danger in this respect is to those with basically
female thought tendencies: in them the cup shape is already
present and unless forward-going, positive thought is given
preference, a negative trend results.
Because of their differing thought patterns, there is a
difference also in the vibrations between male thought and
female thought. Male thought, being direct, tends to vibrate at
one speed at a time; female thought, on the other hand, being
diffuse, vibrates throughout at varying speeds. This makes it
more difficult for two such thinkers to relate to one another
than it is for two who have the direct, male type of thought
pattern. Maleness and femaleness in thought, however, relate
well, being complementary and compensatory each to the other.
The main problem with male
thought is that it tends to forge blindly ahead, ignoring the
side-effects and sometimes oblivious of having turned into a
negative pattern. Male thought is aggressive. Therefore it tends
to lead to such undesirable activities as fighting and
destructiveness. Only if the compensatory female thought allows
itself and is allowed to inter-react with male thought is a
proper balance maintained.
When our time-slot was
first created a tremendous amount of primeval energy must have
been thrust into it to start the evolution of the primeval
galaxy. It is reasonable to suppose that more had to be added to
do the work of dividing the galaxy into two, and so on down the
length of the time-slot. The subsidiary time-slot in which the
Solar System evolved was later treated in the same way. This
factor - the addition of primeval radiation from outside the
time-slot - may account for the apparently sudden and massive
geological revolutions as well as for the equally sudden
appearance of new animals and plants.
has been discovered that the protein molecule is the immediate
ancestor of the virus, which may be described as a protein
molecule capable of reproduction. Although the record of the
rocks cannot be expected to yield information about so small a
living thing, the fact that proteins capable of reproduction
have been artificially produced, coupled with the protein-basis
of all living things, indicates that this is how life was
started. In order to do the work of creating life, once again
primeval energy must have been thrust in from outside; and for
every major mutation the process was repeated. This stem of
radiation has been maintained, then, from the time when the
first virus appeared, and all life has arisen from it. Since,
when observed from the viewpoint of Eternity, everything is
visible, life on Earth is seen in the time-slot in the form of a
tree, the radiation being continuous from the beginning,
branching out, some branches being cut off by extinction,
others, irradiated by additional primeval energy from time to
time, continuing to the present time. This has been referred to
as the Tree of Life, or, more recently, the evolutionary tree.
tree analogy is apt. We see only the plants and animals now
living, but in Eternity the radiation is all connected and goes
back to the source outside the time-slot. The individual plants
and animals are, like blossoms and fruit, simply agents of the
continuity of life. As such, they fall off and die; but the life
that is in them goes on.
It has however, to be
emphasized that only the material "fruit" on the tree dies: in
radiation form - that is, in the fifth dimension - a nodule of
radiation, plant-shaped or animal-shaped, remains.
The man-shaped "fruit" appears on the upper or more recent
branches of the tree. In theory, a time-traveller would be able
to view the whole tree and from it accurately read the
evolutionary record. Since this method proved impossible,
evolutionists discovered a very simple alternative means of
discovering how each animal and plant evolved from a single cell
(which itself had evolved from living protein) to the
present-day plant or animal. In examining the embryos of fish,
frogs, chicks, mice and other animals at various stages of
development and comparing what they found with fossil evidence
found in the rocks which had been investigated by geologists,
they discovered that each animal, at the embryonic stage,
recapitulates its past. The significance of this was that by
examining embryonic development the evolutionary story of the
particular animal could be read just as it could have been on
the evolutionary tree; and from this diagrams representing the
tree could be drawn.
It may be imagined that this evidence was conclusive, but it so
happened that a fascinating possibility had already caught the
imagination of scientists and other advanced thinkers in the
nineteenth century. In 1859, Charles Darwin had published his
Origin of the Species, in which he had correlated all the
evidence so far found in the rocks and embarked on a massive
re-classification of all life on Earth. Homo sapiens was found
to be closely related to apes and slightly less closely to
monkeys, and this led on the one hand to the condemnation of
Darwin and all his works by the religious bodies, and on the
other hand to the somewhat frantic search for the "missing
link". This creature was thought to have been something halfway
between ape and man, descended from a common ape or ape-like
ancestor. It is interesting that Darwin, in his Origin of the
Species, had very little to say about man: the book deals mainly
with his theory of natural selection as the basis of evolution.
By the mid-20th century, however, the descent of man from an ape
was regarded as an established fact: the record in the embryonic
development had been disregarded to fit in with the ape-man
theory and in some publications, man was listed under the
Heading of "The Five Kinds of Man-like Ape".
One of the events which
influenced scientists in favor of the ape-man theory was the
discovery in 1912 at Piltdown in England of the bones of a
creature which seemed to have had the cranium of a man and the
jaw of an ape. The man concerned in this discovery was an
amateur archaeologist called Charles Dawson who died four years
later still crowned with honors, including the naming of his
discovery as Eoanthropus Dawsoni. In 1953, by which time carbon-dating was being used to confirm such discoveries, the bones
were re-examined by Dr. David Peacock and found to be from two
different individuals, an ape and a man. The so-called "missing
link" was proved to be a hoax perpetrated by Dawson and the
whole "ape-man" theory would have fallen to the ground had it
not become so deeply entrenched in accepted thinking. By the
time the hoax was exposed, other bones had been discovered in
various parts of the world which might support the ape-man
theory, and in the meantime theories about an even older simian
ancestor had been accepted. A small, lemur-like animal was
suggested as a further missing link this time between ape-man
and monkeys, presumably because these creatures are found in two
varieties, one with tails and the other without.
When we examine and compare the embryos of fish, frog and man at
different stages of development, the story we read is quite
different. All three go through the same stages of development
up to the fish stage. Here the fish drops out to grow to
adulthood and the other two go on to the frog stage, where the
neck is still absent. The frog then goes on to adulthood, while
the embryo man, still without a neck and with frog-like lower
limbs, begins to acquire a man-like head. There is no ape stage.
The ape embryo follows the same development right up to the frog
stage, after which the embryo begins to take on ape
From the embryonic evidence it has to be concluded that man did
not evolve from an ape or from any ape-like animal, but, much
earlier than had been supposed, from a frog. The evidence is
there in the development of the fetus. The frog - a giant frog
in all probability - is the "missing link". Apes too are seen to
have developed from a frog - but a different frog: the division
between apes and man occurred at the amphibian stage. Monkeys,
since they have tails, are seen to have evolved from an
amphibian with a tail, a rather large salamander perhaps; so
here the division was earlier still, at the point where
primitive frogs lost their tails for the first time in
adulthood. It seems likely that all mammals originated in the
same way from differing amphibian ancestors, reptiles developing
simultaneously from other amphibians.
Relating the embryonic record with geological evolution, man,
thought at first to have appeared as late as the Pleistocene
Period, about 5000 B.C. (prior to which he was supposed to have
been an ape), may now be placed in the swamps of the
Carboniferous Period about 300-350 million years ago. This was
the time at which coal deposits were laid down, and I have
myself seen a fossilized foot with toes like those of a man,
embedded in a lump of coal. Other evidence is constantly coming
forward which places man much farther back in geological time
than was at first thought likely. In 1972 evidence was found in
the rocks that man was walking upright over 200 million years
The picture we get, then, of early man as he developed in the
swamps from a giant frog, is of a wallowing creature who at
first laid eggs as do all frogs, but later developed a means of
holding them near to its body, and so an external uterus must
have developed which later, by mutation and natural selection,
began to develop within the body; and so early man, together
with early ape and all but a few of the other descendants of the
early amphibians, was able to emerge from the swamps and live
out his life on land.
It is interesting that
hair growth on the human body resembles that of semi-aquatic
animals and that swimming remains popular to this day.
When this website was being compiled for Joan and I was editing
this book, I was very "open" to humans evolving from water like
everything else and that our "missing link" was a giant frog,
even though it seemed strange to think this. Then within two
weeks of coming into this knowledge, a baby was born on December
4, 2005 in Nepal.
The great geological
revolutions which separate the various eons, eras, periods, and
epochs, have long mystified students of the subject: likewise,
no explanation has been found for the great and apparently
rather sudden disappearance of one set of animals and their
replacement by others, usually more advanced and less
unpleasant, often smaller and physically weaker. We have seen
that the primeval energy in which the Universe first appeared
has always remained connected with the evolutionary tree, and
this is where, I think, we must look for cause of the geological
revolutions and for the predisposing factor which brought the
amphibians out of the swamps, and with them primitive man.
The analogy of the tree is used also by individual families in
tracing their genealogy. This brings us to an interesting
question: if we are descended equally from our father and our
mother, surely the tree analogy does not hold: rather, a network
is suggested, linking family to family. Now, it is true that
this network does exist, connecting us all to our mothers and
grandmothers as well as to our fathers and grandfathers. But it
is a fact that children inherit their blood group from their
father alone, and it is this blood connection which is the basis
of the genealogical tree. The ancients knew about it, though it
is more likely that their knowledge was based on the idea that
the fetus developed from a seed produced only by the male. The
early books of the Old Testament attempt to give a detailed
genealogy from Adam to the later Israelite leaders and the
strongly patriarchal society which later spread west across
Europe was based on the same theory. Meanwhile, the ancient
Greeks suggested that man might have evolved from more primitive
animals, but this theory together with those concerning the
Solar System, was swept aside by the up rise of Christianity, and
all research on the descent of man was discouraged. Blood
descent through the male was the only accepted theory, and as
late as the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, by which time
microscopes were in use, the male reproductive cell was seen as
a microscopical baby, often drawn as such and known as the
The discovery that the fetus actually developed from the ovum
produced by the female and fertilized by the addition of the
sperm from the male might have altered our concept of the family
tree entirely had it not been discovered by the same means -
ever more powerful microscopes - that the father, rather than
the mother, was responsible for the baby's blood. It is true
that some of the minor factors come from the mother, but the
male blood descent is well illustrated in the case of mothers
with the comparatively rare factor in their serum which may
cause the baby's blood cells to clump together, causing jaundice
which may prove fatal. Such mothers are known as Rh (from rhesus
monkeys used during the research) negative. Most people are Rh
positive. The problem arises when the mother is Rh negative and
the father Rh positive: the fetus at first receives blood from
the mother through the placenta, but when it starts
manufacturing its own in readiness for birth, it produces Rh
positive blood - the same as that of its father. Because it is
known that a child will inherit its father's blood, tests are
nowadays done in advance so that the worst effects of the
jaundice may be averted.
To a certain extent, blood groups may be used to establish
paternity and to aid genealogical research. In some cases this
has proved useful in deciding where or even if an individual's
name should be added to a family tree, in other cases, where
families have travelled from one country to another, suspected
collateral descent may be confirmed.
For the purposes of this study, what is important is that the
connection to the father is stronger than that to the mother.
The radiation for the blood group comes down on the male line.
However, there are other reasons why the child may receive more
radiation from the father than from the mother. We have seen in
dealing with the effects of radiation on plants and animals that
they thrive better under the influence of prayer and love which
are the same as the beneficial radiation that came in the first
instance from the matrix of Eternity. We have also seen that it
is the male who initiates while the female absorbs and reacts.
It is only at the reactive stage that the female begins to
contribute radiation, and this delay gives the male a
head-start. The shorter the courtship, the less radiation will
come from the female and the stronger the inheritance will be
from the male. This may be why in some families the elder
children appear to be more like the father and the younger ones
more like the mother. The effect of the extra radiation from the
male on the genes is not certain: it would seem that it
predisposes a sperm with dominant genes to fertilize the ovum,
thus ensuring that the child is more like the father than the
The effects of the male dominance in inheritance may best be
studied in royal and other dynastical families where father
preceded son over a number of generations. Where the male line
ends, the death of the dynasty is visible. The Hanoverians who
succeeded the Stuarts were collaterals on a female line and
quite unlike them in both character and appearance. That line
ended with Queen Victoria and again the appearance of the royal
family changed. Naturally the same process was at work in
medieval times among all classes of people and may partly
explain why such brilliant craftsmen were to be found then. They
tended to marry within their own craft.
However, other factors have been at work: the demise of the
arranged marriage must have tended to emphasize the female
contribution. It would seem that love-matches, preceded by a
long courtship, tended to give both parents an equal chance,
leaving aside the question of the blood group.
We may conclude, then, that any one family must share the same
blood and the same mainstream of radiation via the male line,
modified to a certain extent by the introduction of weaker
streams of radiation from the various female connections.
Because of this shared family radiation, the question of
reincarnation arises. Indeed, where the male line is strong, and
also shared, it might even be expected to flow from one family
member to another, giving rise to "family memories" - vivid
memories recorded as having come down through several
generations, so that a grandson may remember an actual event
which happened to his grandfather. Another example is to be
found in shared sensations, particularly between twins who have
developed from one individual fertilized ovum. An accident to
one twin, who may be far away, causes the other to collapse.
Many experiments have been carried out with closely-related
people and animals which proves that the connection exists. It
may well be that we exist as individual families rather than as
individual persons. In most people, however, radiation is not
strong enough to produce family memories or shared sensations.
the memories come from very far back - several centuries perhaps
- re-incarnation has been suspected. In most cases, this is
probably unlikely. Experiments have been done with the simple
worm planarium which indicate that memories may be passed on
from one generation to the next. However, there are certain
cases of complete personality-change which suggest something
more than the mere inheritance of memory. I studied the case of
a young student who was at first a very poor learner and greatly
disturbed by what he said were dreams about his
great-grandfather, whom he had never met but whose memory was
greatly respected in the family.
Suddenly his problems came to
an end and he changed completely, becoming a good student, much
more intelligent than he had formerly been, and, most
interesting of all, gradually changed in appearance. Older
members of the family and even the boy himself remarked how much
he now resembled his great-grandfather, and he claimed he was
now a re-incarnation of him.
Re-incarnation is something which is very difficult to prove,
but it would seem possible on the face of it that where family
radiation is lacking an exchange may be made, a stronger
concentration coming down from the past and pushing the weaker
out. In this way it would be possible for a man quite literally
to live again in a descendant.
Many cases which seem to
suggest this kind of re-incarnation have been recorded. It would
appear, then, that the process could take place at an earlier
stage, even before birth, in which case it would pass
From the foregoing we must conclude that love is the great power
in radiation, or, more accurately, that radiation and love are
synonymous. We speak of the matrix of Eternity and of its power,
of the tremendous thrust of energy required to engender time in
space and to create the primeval Universe. This radiation and
its power comes down to us through the evolutionary tree and
through our individual family trees and is seen and felt as
family radiation and ability to love - ability to pass on the
radiation to succeeding generations.
theory, an increase in the population of creatures capable of
love should affect the temperature of the immediate surroundings
so that an increase in population density might be expected to
give warmer winters - unless, of course, love among them
declined. Not all of the radiation which warms this Earth comes
from the Sun. Experiments along these lines have yet to be done,
but considering the need to limit families and the tremendous
amount of energy being lost which would otherwise have been
concentrated into a new individual, it would seem that the power
of love is, to a great extent, being wasted or disregarded.
If it is disregarded, it will not be called in from the matrix
of Eternity - and this, as far as we in this Universe are
concerned, is wasteful.
As I write these words, North America is having the coldest
winter in recorded history. It is also going through a period,
as is most of the rest of the world, where love is disregarded.
I think it will emerge that we do this at our peril; no mere man
can hope to stand up to the power of the energy which opened up
our time-slot, thrust our galaxy into it, divided it into two
and then proceeded to endow it with life.
When a time capsule - a
UFO - comes close to Earth, the wild time associated with its
outer cover of electrons affects clocks, while the electrons
themselves also have an effect on what is below.
In February 1977, a man was driving his car at Doucetteville,
N. S., when a large time capsule about sixty feet long and
multi-colored, with blue on top and red beneath, passed over
him. The ammeter jumped and the clock leapt forward ten minutes,
while he himself felt what seemed like an electric shock and a
sensation that his skin was being "dragged off". It was
frightening, but he hung on and it passed silently over. Then
everything returned to normal and all he had apparently lost was
The man who told this story on television apparently did not see
any people in the time capsule, but by the time it was next
sighted on the same day at least two men were travelling in it,
and it was making a humming noise. This may not have been
audible to everybody as it was at a very low pitch.
question that arises is how the occupants obtained the energy to
propel their capsule. Nobody really knows how such things work,
but on the face of it, it appears that they are modelled on the
larger, more familiar time systems and it could be that in
creating their own time-slot they have overcome the problems
connected with the concept of perpetual motion; resistance and
inertia, for instance.
A further problem is that we do not know what kind of men they
are who fly these things, or whence they come. All reports -
there are so many nowadays that they can no longer be ignored -
indicate that men are indeed present, but that they are
different from ourselves in many ways. They appear to be
electrically charged, capable of overcoming opposition as if by
hypnosis. Some have taken people into their spacecraft and
returned them to Earth unharmed; others are reported to have
taken people permanently.
photographs have been taken of UFOs, some of which may have been
Numerous photographs have
been taken of UFOs, some of which may have been time capsules.
Unfortunately, in spite of sightings, stories and photographs,
we still know almost nothing about them or about the men who fly
them. For my own part, although I am convinced that they are
miniature time systems, dependent on vibrations and controlled
by them, I feel that there is room for much more research.
However, it is possible to suggest by what means they may be
obtaining the energy they need. For this purpose it is
convenient to refer to their occupants as men - modified men
perhaps, but in many ways similar to ourselves. The important
thing is that just as all the large time systems are connected
with the matrix of Eternity, from which they draw their energy,
so by analogy must these smaller time capsules. It seems that
the men who fly them have devised a way to do this.
Man has an advantage over other creatures in that he can think
more deeply; indeed, it is this ability to think as he does that
sets man so far above the rest of the animal world. With it goes
an ability to love which is equalled by very few other species.
By these means, man has been able to receive more from the
matrix of Eternity than any other creature, and this has enabled
him increasingly to pull ahead. He is innovative, resilient and
persistent; if he comes up against an obstacle, he gets around
it; if his way is blocked, he finds another. All animals
instinctively act for the benefit of their own species: man
alone has the ability to think out how to do it and that
tremendous source of energy has always been available to him, to
be called upon at will provided the individual concerned has the
knowledge, intelligence and wisdom to apply it to the benefit of
Bearing in mind the nature of time systems, it seems likely that
what those who fly time capsules have done is to devise a way to
strengthen their connection with the matrix of Eternity and in
this way to use it to propel themselves through space, vibrating
at such a speed as to keep a time capsule aloft and moving.
Since apparently these men have studied and understand the
various vibratory speeds available to them, they probably
created their spacecraft themselves by the same means. It has to
be remembered that a time capsule is not made of metal or any
solid material: it is a miniature universe, bounded and kept in
balance by various forces.
Since these time travellers can apparently harness primeval
energy in this way, it seems a little strange that Earth men
have not so far succeeded to anything like the same extent.
Allowing for the fact that their bodies, even if similar to ours
in appearance, may be very different in the way they function,
it is unlikely that their feats could be equalled by Earth men.
But all men, including ourselves here on Earth, are able to call
upon the primeval energy that forms that matrix of Eternity
through thought and love, and have done so to a certain extent,
even if unconsciously, from the outset.
Looking at the past, many
instances of its apparent use have been recorded, particularly
in the Bible. To multiply matter energy is required. It must
have been used, for instance, when Jesus fed the multitude on a
totally inadequate supply of bread and fish: he obviously had
the power to multiply matter. Little is heard nowadays of such a
power, yet there were apparently other instances since those
days. Perhaps the formula, which involves mathematical ratios of
huge proportions, was forgotten, dying with those who knew and
seems to have been known to Richard II of England who lived
1367-1400 and reigned 1377-1399 and whose life was cut off too
soon by an envious cousin. He claimed that he had Divine Right
and it was rumored that as King he had the power of multiplying
metals. In medieval times the creation of gold from base metals
was the subject of much experimentation; likewise the ability to
multiply gold once some was obtained. The envious cousin was
Henry Bolingbroke, who usurped the throne and imprisoned Richard
at Pontefract, where a year later he was murdered. Henry was
apparently surprised when the gold he had taken from Richard did
not automatically increase and banned its production, though
tacitly making an exception of the Royal Mint. He acted in vain,
but still leaves the impression that his murdered cousin must
have been able to multiply matter. Was this what Richard meant,
in part, by Divine Right? Certainly he was an unusually cultured
and intelligent man who evidently had more up his sleeve than
the handkerchief with whose invention he is credited.
When he died, poverty, mediocrity, piracy, and pestilence
There is probably no way of proving conclusively that Richard II
could multiply metals or that it was with his murder that the
formula was lost. But if Richard could do as is claimed of him,
he must also have been able to obtain the necessary energy. The
loss of that knowledge and ability was far greater than the loss
of the formula, and had it not been lost history might have
taken a very different course.
It may well be that because of what Henry IV did, a nation which
might otherwise have benefited above all others from the
connection with the matrix of Eternity, was forced to find an
alternative and less satisfactory way forward. With the vital
connection all but cut and ignorant of what was needed to bring
them wealth and prosperity, the people turned to machines as a
The great power was still available, but the people, not
understanding, benefited only from the by-products of love.
Unfortunately the situation is not static: love is for many
different reasons on the decrease. We all know that love
radiates - that is, it does not all go to the object of
affection. Less love means less radiation; less radiation means
less available energy. We see everywhere a disregard for love,
not only between people but in other respects: less love for
one's country, for instance, less love for one's work; and
despite the huge pet animal population, less love for animals.
Farming now depends on machines and increasingly only
food-producing animals remain whose lives are mechanized from
birth to the slaughterhouse.
Machines, which at first improved the lot of mankind, seem to
run our lives. They were supposed to give us more time, but all
they do is to make us hurry.
It seems strange that apparently nobody came forward with an
alternative - except the men in the time capsules, and we have
yet to discover where they come from.
We have always assumed
that the occupants of UFOs or time capsules - the time
travellers - come from another planet or even from another star
system like that of our Sun. In fact no proof of this exists and
the possibility which seems never to have been considered is
that they originated on this planet. That would explain their
apparent fascination with the Earth and its people.
For some not altogether explicable reason throughout history
those who have tried to discover and study the nature of the
Universe have come under suspicion and been subjected to
persecution. The civilizations of ancient Greece and Rome gave a remarkable amount of freedom to those with the ability and the
desire to understand the world around them. It was during this
Massalia discovered what is now
Scandinavia (330-325 B.C.) and he was the first man to devise a
means of using astronomical
measurements to ascertain the
position of places on the Earth's surface. Eratosthenes
(275-194? B.C.) invented latitude and longitude, divided the
Earth into temperature zones and estimated for the first time
its circumference. Then came Hipparchus (?190-125 B.C.) who
introduced the division into degrees, and his follower, Posidonius (?135-51 B.C.). They were both followers of
Eratosthenes and according to the records the first to meet with
serious opposition. A man called Polybius, contemporary with
Hipparchus, launched a vicious campaign against him, and his
followers opposed Posidonius. Ptolemy, who
lived in the second
Christ, recorded all that had been discovered and
invented in astronomy up to Posidonius and drew the best map of
the world yet to be produced up to his time. There everything
stopped, and throughout the Dark Ages during and after the Fall
of the Roman Empire, anyone who attempted further investigation
of the Universe was in serious trouble. It was actually more
acceptable to say that the Earth was flat than to suggest that
it might be revolving around the Sun.
Nicholas Copernicus (1473-1543),
living so many centuries later,
did not dare to publish his description of the Solar System. This was done only after his death.
Galileo Galilei (1564-1642),
a follower of Copernicus, was, in spite of the acceptance of his
many other discoveries and inventions, thrown into jail and
forced to recant when he stated that the Earth rotated around
Galileo lived in the seventeenth century,
only three hundred
years before Einstein. Less than two hundred years later came
the Industrial Revolution and the upsurge of modern science, but
persecution was, if anything, on the increase as witness the
French Revolution, not to mention the slave trade. Not all those
persecuted were intellectuals - in some ways the tables were
turned when the most able men of their time were chosen to
replace deposed monarchs. But, despite their claim to be "enlightened", the revolutionary
France executed Lavoisier, now known as the father of modern
1794. His crime was the discovery and
investigation of oxygen.
It would hardly be surprising, then, if the followers of those
who died, from Richard II onwards - he was murdered 73 years
before the birth of Copernicus - devised a way to modify their
bodies to overcome death, took their secrets with them, and
lived on for centuries on end in their own time capsules.
Perhaps, too, other persecuted or rejected but intellectually
brilliant minorities, turned out of their native lands and
wander the Earth, disappeared in this way. Nobody would have missed them - nobody wanted them.
The Jews spring to
mind: some of them might have been involved; and the wandering
tribes of Gypsies, whose more brilliant members still preserve
secrets of clairvoyance and the like, as well as the descendants
of Leif Erikson, Viking discoverer of North America, who are
said to have completely disappeared.
More recently, since the French
been the subjects of attack - some like the Romanovs said to
have been executed, but their bodies never
found. And what
happened to all the Jacobites, many of them forbidden, as was
the poet Alexander Pope, to attend a University? What more
natural than to have set up a University of their own, safe and
sound in space? Again, what happened to Louis XVII, the "lost
Dauphin", supposed to have disappeared from jail as a boy of ten
in 1795? Did he, too, join the denizens of the skies? And did
some of these persecuted minorities -I can think of many others
besides those listed - armed with their secret formulae and
knowledge of the Universe, organize and set up a nation of their
Perhaps, now, they are coming back to help us solve our
The five dimensions so far considered all exist in the
time-slot. Of these, only radiation exists in the matrix of
Eternity outside the time-slot. To leave the time-slot and go
into Eternity involves increasing the vibrations until they are
so fast that time disappears, i.e. when the speed of light is
reached. At this point time becomes spatial and a very deep hole
is seen in the matrix: length and time are one, or, from another
point of view, depth and time are one.
(Click) Time has in fact
disappeared. The speed of vibration increases, the hole closes
and only radiation remains: now length, breadth, height, time,
and radiation are one.
The question which now arises is what additional dimensions, if
any, exist in the matrix of Eternity and what effect these, if
present, would have on any time-slot, whether it be large like
the main time-slot containing the Universe and all the
subsidiary time-slots, or small, like a time capsule.
It might be supposed that because he can exist in the plasma in
space, which is itself radiation and connected to the matrix of
Eternity, a man in a time capsule will also be safe in the
matrix itself. This, however, does not necessarily apply: the
main time-slot is vast and has had enormous quantities of energy
thrust into it, so that no matter what forces affect it from
outside, it is unlikely to fail: it has a very strong connection
to the source, on which it can always draw in such an unlikely
emergency. The comparatively tiny time capsules have nothing
comparable to this strength: they depend only on one or two men
inside who, although capable of obtaining energy from the
source, have no such strong connection and even if they had,
would not be able to benefit from it, since the sheer quantity
of energy would be too much for so delicately-balanced a thing
as a time capsule.
One of the problems in the matrix is that radiation for
everything and its opposite is present and present in vast and
over-powering quantities with overwhelming strength. This
radiation is uncoordinated, i.e. is not formed into anything,
and so runs hither and thither: it is in fact wild radiation,
very dangerous and unpredictable.
Worse than that, however, is the presence of a sixth dimension,
that of pattern or the original concept. Pattern and radiation
are the pre-requisites of existence, but whereas within the
time-slot only the best patterns need be introduced, in Eternity
all exist and may affect the matrix and anything in it.
Beset by these twin influences and in such conditions, a time
capsule cannot exist but will, together with its occupants,
simply become part of the matrix.
Fortunately there is a solution: time capsules belong not in the
matrix, but in the time-slot - in the plasma; so, with a little
help from the source, any time-traveller who has been too
venturesome can be returned to safety. And there are, of course,
inhibiting factors which would prevent him from ever getting
into the matrix in the first place. The forces present in
Eternity outside the time-slot would push him back. If he did
get out, however, his sixth dimension - his pattern - would not
be destroyed; and somewhat chastened, perhaps, he would find
himself back in the main time-slot and making himself a new time
capsule, none the worse for his experience.
It is the sixth dimension, then - the pattern - which ensures
that everything that has ever existed and has been found to be
good shall not be destroyed.
In theory, that which has not been found to work well may have
its pattern destroyed and thus be utterly wiped out. However,
because of the nature of Eternity, in which everything that is,
was, or will be must be present, this is only possible within a
system which has time. In other words, only in time is it
possible to improve, and even there, bad or unworkable patterns
must still exist in the past. That, we must assume, is what
happened to the dinosaurs, as very few dangerous reptiles have
come down to us from those days.
It is interesting that we
speak of things "coming down" from the past: this gives us a
more-or-less vertical time-slot apparently hanging in the matrix,
with the past at the top and the future below, trailing away into
the distance. The Earth, too, seems to have its upper and lower
parts - we think of the North Pole as being uppermost. In the same
way, the Solar System has upper and lower regions, as have all its
planets. This is a concept which comes, apparently, from the source
of our energy in the matrix of Eternity. The concept arises because
it is from the upper regions of the time-slot that energy is being
drawn; it was there that it was pushed in when the time-slot was
first formed. Each galaxy, as well as the Solar System and each
planet, has its own subsidiary time-slot and is connected to the
matrix of Eternity, and where this connection is found becomes, as a
concept, uppermost. In the case of the Earth, it is the northern
There is, then, a further explanation for the cloud of electrons
found over the North Pole: such a cloud, though much larger, must
have preceded the formation of the Earth and may have predisposed it
towards a slightly pear-like shape since, by their presence, these
electrons would have been constantly attracting nuclear material to
the upper part of the amorphous mass destined to become Earth. Some
of these original electrons remained and in present conditions, of
course, they balance the nuclear material at the core of the Earth.
The connection with the matrix of Eternity and with the source of
its energy, together with the existence of patterns which may be
changed as time goes on, ensures that everything within the time-
slot must improve as we move into the future.
Perhaps the time travellers are part of that future.
Energy is the basis of all
things; all is in Eternity.
Energy is thought: as primeval energy it is undirected; as radiation
it is directed, and moves in spirals.
Every concept is matched by another which is equal and opposite.
Radiation may be favorable or unfavorable to life.
Wild radiation is energy which
is directed but uncoordinated.
The matrix of Eternity
consists of energy and wild radiation. A dimension is a condition
Eternity has two dimensions, pattern and radiation, and four
potential dimensions, time, length, breadth and height or depth (the
two last being aspects of the same concept).
Time-slots have the two basic
dimensions plus the four others, and so contain space.
Time is created in conditions
of lack of relative motion. Wild time is uncoordinated and occurs
where there is space.
All speeds in Eternity are
vibratory; linear speeds do not occur. Speeds within a time-slot may
be linear, vibratory speeds also occur.
Nothing is ever totally
destroyed since it exists in Eternity. Only in time is it possible
to destroy what is unfavorable to life.
Only in time may life be
created or exist. In time, that which is destroyed is left in the
All that is observed from the
viewpoint of Eternity is eternal.
All that is observed from
within space appears to be spatial, including that which is outside
space in the matrix of Eternity. When time is created in the matrix
of Eternity, it is seen as infinite length or infinite depth, having
also breadth; space is created; vibrations have slowed down to the
speed of light.
Viewed from outside, a time-slot appears to be finite; viewed from
inside the space there appears to be infinite: an example which may
be observed is the time capsule (known as a UFO).
Light is the first thing to be created within a time-slot, being
caused by the presence of radiation.
To create anything within a time-slot, primeval energy and radiation
must be present and must be thrust in from outside.
To create the Universe and every part of it, much radiation had to
be thrust in.
To create life on earth and to cause every mutation yet more
radiation had to be thrust in.
The geological revolutions and the comparatively sudden general
mutations among living things were brought about by such an inflow
upper part of everything created is that part which from the outset
has been connected with the source of energy in the matrix of
Maleness and femaleness in thought are equal and opposite and
inter-react to shape events. Maleness is direct; femaleness is
"The Crucifixion" Fresco painted 1350. Visoki
Decani Monastery in Kosovo, Yugoslavia.
Believed to be a Comet, are these reincarnated men granted their
The radiation in a family is shared and so what affects one family
member may affect others.
Within a family, re-incarnation by means of family radiation is
possible. Family radiation may cause
family memories to occur.
The act of loving calls in radiation from the matrix of Eternity;
some is passed
on to future generations; the rest may be either
allowed to escape into the surroundings or put to some use.
Close-up of Fresco UFOs
Where there is love, the surroundings which absorb radiation are
seen to benefit.
In theory, the energy which becomes available from this radiation
may be used to modify living things and to create small time-slots
or time capsules which are seen as UFOs.
Joan Hope is not
the only person to have seen and
communicated with those of us
The number of Time Travellers appearing in the
Art of history are
too numerous to add to this book.
To see more UFOs in Earth's History, click to visit
Don't forget to read the notes below first, if you
haven't read them already.
Note 1.Speeds greater than that of light-186.000 miles/second Einstein's
theory: Velocities greater than that of light have no
possibility of existence. This was applied to the Universe by
They concluded that when the velocity of the receding galaxies
reaches that of light they will no longer be seen.
There is a law of science, applicable to Earth, which states that
entropy (a measure of degree of disorganization) must increase.
This when applied to the Universe led to the theory that it was
gradually disintegrating. Both theories were used in research.
Dr. B. B. Sinha has suggested that Einstein had in mind only the
ordinary matter of the Earth's Milky Way and other known galaxies.
Tachyons; In 1962, another theory arose that there must exist
some particles with a velocity greater than that of light. For
years, scientists had been suggesting that such particles existed,
but only in 1962 was the theory generally accepted. They were given
the name of tachyons and scientists are now working on their
identification. So far none have been discovered in existence.
According to Einstein's theory as interpreted, when the receding
galaxies reach the speed of light, the light from them ceases to
reach us so they "disappear". The same thing happens when an
aircraft exceeds the speed of sound: suddenly it is not heard for a
while. That does not mean that the aircraft is no longer there. In
other words, the "disappearance" of the galaxies is an illusion.
It is easier to understand what happens when an object exceeds the
speed of light if we think of it as approaching rather than receding
from a second object at that speed. When they reach that point they
will experience being apart and being together at the same moment -
i.e. time and space disappear and all speeds above the speed of
light are vibratory.
Dr. Sinha has suggested that scientists are looking for the wrong
kind of particles, and in the wrong places. Perhaps the reason why
they cannot find any tachyons is that they expect their speed to be
linear when in fact it is vibratory.
Einstein's equation E=Mc▓ implies a speed equal to the speed of
light squared c▓, so clearly he understood that higher speeds
existed in atomic fission. M, the mass, is vibrating at c▓ when
fission occurs. At that point matter breaks down into its component
particles and becomes energy.
In this sense, a galaxy could "disappear" in that its individual
stars would be gone. However, it would still be seen as a mass of
Note 2. Time seen as Length:
Nobody doubts that time has length, but this is experienced rather
than seen; the observer has to go outside time to see its length.
Since time has length, all that is in it also has length of time
which may be observed in the same way. If we imagine a car going
along a road from point A to point B, it will take a certain length
of time to do so. But viewed from Eternity it will be seen at all
points between A and B and so will appear as a long streak. A
photographic time exposure as the car travels from A to B will
register the time taken and a streak will appear on the photograph.
Note 3. Mendel's Theory of Heredity:
Gregor Johann Mendel (1822-1884) was an Austrian Roman Catholic
Priest and scientist. His studies of pea plant growth led to a
rather rigid theory based on constant dominant and recessive factors
existing in individual plants or animals in pairs, one factor from
each pair being passed on to each individual in the next generation.
Later his theory seemed to be confirmed when such factors were found
to be carried in the genes.
His experiment with peas involved numerous offspring, which made it
difficult to apply, for instance, to man, though it could be applied
to fruit flies. He discovered in his pea plants a tall factor T and
a short factor t and by crossing two plants Tt and Tt - both tall
because T was dominant - he found that he ended up with 250 short
plants in 1,000. Of the remaining 750, 500 carried a recessive t
factor and would produce a proportion of short progeny as the
parents had done, while 250 would produce, if crossed with each
other, only tall plants. Thus the offspring of Tt and Tt were in the
proportions of one TT, one tt and two Tt.
Mendel's theory was found to apply to a limited extent to man, in
that brown eyes were found to be dominant to blue and therefore, if
a brown-eyed person married one with blue eyes and they had four
children, probably three would have brown eyes and one blue. The
same was found to apply to families with a tendency to hemophilia:
the disease, in which blood will not clot and patients may bleed to
death from a small cut, was found to be carried by a recessive gene.
Because Queen Victoria had a large family which this gene was found
to exist, a study was made of her descendants and Mendel's theory
was found to apply.
However, the theory is now no longer regarded as applicable in all
cases. Even if it were, the progeny, especially in man, is seldom
numerous enough for Mendelian inheritance to function. Quite apart
from this, however, there are other factors which did not show up in
Mendel's experiments. Genes are not always constant: a dominant gene
may become recessive, for instance, and slight mutations are going
on all the time, caused by the presence of radiation - for
instance, radiation from the parents or in the case of plants and
animals, from those who tend them; and radiation from the
In other words, an experiment which in laboratory conditions proves
the theory to be correct in those controlled conditions cannot be
applied to life, in which so many other factors are involved.
It so happens that eye-color is less affected by these other
factors. It also may be that diseases, such as hemophilia, tend to
be bred out by their remaining recessive in which case natural
selection would perhaps also be involved.
Note 4. The DNA Spiral: The
spiral, a feature of the entire Universe from galaxy to atom, has
also been found to be present in the chromosomes of living cells.
Two nucleic acids are mainly concerned in cells, ribonucleic acid
(RNA) and deoxyribonucleic acid (DMA), which remains in the nucleus
and is the substance of the genes found in the chromosomes of every
cell of an individual plant or animal. In mitosis, the process of
ordinary cell division, the amount of DNA first doubles, and each
new cell has the same number of chromosomes as the parent cell.
Reproductive cells, however, divide by meiosis: new cells are formed
with only half the amount of DNA and half the number of chromosomes
present in the original cell, so that when two join together they
form one whole cell which proceeds to divide by mitosis as the new
strands of DNA molecules which form the chromosomes are sometimes
referred to as genetic tapes because on them is recorded all the
data needed for the growth of the new individual and for its
maintenance as an adult. Each cell contains in its nucleus the
number of chromosomes peculiar to its species. Each chromosome
contains two linked spiral genetic tapes, one from each parent, the
links consisting of nitrogen compounds and being so arranged as to
pass on characteristics from the parents to the new individual.
Heredity depends on these nitrogenous links and the only factor
which can affect them is radiation from outside. DNA spirals are
Protein molecules, if synthesized, may have either a clockwise or a
counterclockwise spiral and come in equal proportions. Proteins
found in nature, however, are all produced by living things and all
have the universal counterclockwise spiral, indicating that they
have been conditioned by the presence of radiation from outside.
Note 5. Black Holes: These have
been found to suck everything into themselves, their gravitational
pull being so strong that it prevents all emission of light or any
other signals. Like most such phenomena, they are many light-years
distant from Earth and so observers are seeing what happened in the
past: Cygnus X-I, for instance, is 8,000 light years away. Black
holes are seen by some astronomers as collapsed stars, which have
imploded with such force that a star many times the size of the Sun
is now a tiny chunk of immensely dense matter invisible to the
observer through his telescope. Some black holes, such as Cygnus
X-1, have been found to be actually binary stars - one star rotating
around another - which are also a feature of the galaxy. The process
is seen by some as a destructive one, in that in binary stars one is
feeding on the other and when it has taken all it is thought to
reach the stage of a black hole which will continue to suck
everything into itself. It has even been suggested that the entire
Universe will one day be sucked into black holes star by star. But
could it be that a black hole is actually a mega-time-slot and the
energy entering it creative? If this is so, we are looking at
creation when we catch sight of a black hole.
Note 6. Kirlian Photography and
Acupuncture: The process known as Kirlian photography was
developed in the USSR and the findings of the Russian researchers
have been confirmed elsewhere. By this process, the low-voltage
electricity glowing from living things may be photographed. Leaves
of plants are found to be outlined with light, while human fingers
sprout what appear to be an extension of the nerve fibers. It seems
that the ancient Chinese were aware of this and used it in
acupuncture to concentrate the pain being carried along the nerves
and draw it out of the body by extending the nerve endings with
7.Kirlian Photography and Ghosts: Experiments
using the Kirlian process have been done with leaves. A cut
leaf, when photographed in this way, shows also, though fainter,
the outline of the part cut off. A dead plant or animal retains
a faint outline of light, and this has even been found when
Egyptian mummies were photographed. If the outline of the
cut-off portion of a leaf remains in this form, it may be that
the same or a similar method of photography could record a
ghostly presence. It is a fact that ghosts have turned up
accidentally in the course of ordinary photography.
-The Stars in their Courses -
Sir James Jeans, London, 1931.
-The Expanding Universe - Sir Arthur Eddington, London, 1931.
-The Mysterious Universe - Sir James Jeans, London.
-The Universe and Man - Paul Bergsoe, London, 1959.
-Man's View of the Universe - R. A. Lyttleton, London, 1961.
-Space Time Motion - Prof. A. V. Vasiliev, Chatto & Windus, London,
-The Science of Life - H. G. Wells, Julian Huxley, G. P. Wells, Cassell
& Co., London, 1934.
-The Origin of the Species - Charles Darwin, Frowde, Oxford, 1907.
-Genetics - H. Kalmus, London, 1948.
-Human Heredity - C.O. Carter,
-General Geology - Robert J. Foster, Charles E. Merrill, Columbus,
-Geology Historical and Physical - H. F. Clenand, American Book Co.,
-Atlantis The Antediluvian World - Ignatius Donnelly, Grernercy, New
-An Outline of Modern Knowledge - Ed. Dr. William Ross, Gollancz,
-In Northern Mists - Fridtjof Nansen, Greenwood, 1910.
-The Norse King Sagas, translated by Samuel Laing.
-Westward to Vinland - Helge Ingstad, Harper, New York, 1969.
-The Stuarts - J J. Foster.
-The Plantagenets - John Harvey, Batsford, London, 1948.
Experiment with Time - J. W. Dunne, Scientific Book Club, London,
1944. (By same author: The New Immortality and Nothing Dies.)
-One Hundred Thousand Years of Man's Unknown History -Robert Charroux,
Berkley, New York, 1970.
-Is Anyone There? - Isaac Asimov, Doubleday, New York.
-Twentieth Century Discovery - Isaac Asimov, Doubleday, New York.
-The Solar System and Back - Isaac Asimov, Doubleday, New York.
-Gods, Graves, and Scholars - S.W. Ceram, Alfred A. Knopf, New York.
-Witchcraft in Tudor and Stuart England - Alan MacFarlane, Routledge,
-Limbo of the Lost (lost ships and planes} - John Wallace
-We are not the First - Andrew Tomas, Souvenir Press, London, 1971.
-Lost Cities - Leonard Cottrell, Robert Hale, London, 1957.
-Myths of the Hindus and Buddhists - Nobel and Coomareswamy, Harrap,
-Ur of the Chaldees - Sir Leonard Woolley, Penguin Books, London,
-The UFO Enigma - Jacques & Janine Vallee, Neville Spearman, London,
-The Scars of Evolution - Elaine Morgan, Souvenir Press, 1990.
If you would like to see where a
word appears in the book simply copy the word then in
the upper left click edit, then find, then
right click and
paste the wordand it will search the document
for you. It may appear more than once, so keep clicking.
Earth, flat, Einstein, Albert
Eternity, matrix of
galaxies, apparent recession of,
galaxies, red shift in,
Galaxy, Milky Way, Galileo.
gravity - see force,
binding, "green thumb",
hall of mirrors effect,
haunting - see ghosts.
love, effect on temperatures
love, power of,
luck, effects of,
matter, multiplication of,
mutations - see genetic changes.
nebulae - see galaxies.
plasma in space,
Peacock, Dr. David,
prayer, effects of,
Pyttieas of Massalia,
Quantum Theory, 12. quasars,
radiation, network of
red shift - see galaxies.
re-incarnation, Richard II,
Scandinavia, discovery of
Sinha, Dr. B.B.
thought, power of time capsule
travel tree, evolutionary/family Tree of Life
UFOs as time capsules
UFO, Doucetteville, N. S. Universe
Universe, "Big Bang"
Universe, continuous creation
Universe, estimated age of
Universe, "Soap Bubble"
Universe, "Steady State" Uranus, Venus,